Hearing the Music

Results filtered by “Andrew VanderMaas”

Practicing the Resurrection

main image

NBA Hall of Fame Allen Iverson once famously and somewhat derisively went on and on talking about “practice" in a press conference saying, "Practice. We talking about practice. Not a game. We talking about practice.”

It doesn’t matter what your vocation or avocation is, practice is crucial to success. The same thing is true when it comes to following Jesus and His call to honor your parents or love your enemies; these things take practice. It is also true of scriptural truths, like the resurrection; it takes practice. I borrowed this idea from Wendell Berry in his poem entitled Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front which encourages a counter-cultural practice of resurrection. Berry specifically encourages a life that swims upstream of culture; a belief in resurrection that when practiced produces things like grace, laughter and joy, even in the face of death. It is a practiced belief that affirms the cross wasn’t a defeat reversed in the resurrection, but rather the cross was the victory confirmed by the bursting forth of the body! Practicing resurrection is the galvanizing of body and soul to live a life of hope even while in exile.

So why are we talking about resurrection and exile? Because this week we come to the last of our studies in the life of Elisha (Check out 2 Kings 13:14-25). Written for God’s people in exile, the lives of both Elijah and Elisha have been repeatedly on display so that we would know that God does not abandon His people. As the ministry of these two amazing prophets comes to an end, we are encourage to see through them to THE prophet who puts the exclamation point on all that they prefigure. While Elisha’s bones bring life to one, Jesus bursts forth to bring life to all enfolded into Him.

So yes, Mr. Iverson. Yes we are. "We talking about PRACTICE.” 

Practice resurrection! 

 

Photo by Noah Silliman on Unsplash

Know Justice

main image

As we come to Labor Day and the unofficial close of the summer season we are also coming toward the close of our journey with the prophets Elijah and Elisha. This penultimate week we will be looking at II Kings, chapters 9 &10, a brutal portion in the history of Israel but an important reminder that we serve a God who cares about justice. Justice is much talked about in our current cultural moment, though often little defined. We tend to think about justice in terms of equality or getting what you deserve. Whereas the Biblical idea of mishpat goes a step further and claims not only equality and rights, but generosity and pro-active advocacy. One person helpfully distinguishes between retributive justice (which we tend to think of in the west) and distributive justice (justice that seeks ways to sow righteousness); mishpat is both of these. This is most clearly seen through the cross of Christ where satisfaction for sin was made (retributive justice) and a hope-filled, new way was forged through the action of a pursuing, merciful benefactor (distributive justice). Tim Keller has written a very helpful piece that examines current articulations of justice and compares them to a Biblical view of justice. I commend it to you.

In addition, the appearance of Labor Day marks the return of fall programming such as Bible studies for men, women, and college-aged, and other discipleship initiatives. Some of these details you may have already heard, but keep your ears peeled as more information will be forthcoming. 

2020 has been a strange year to be sure. But life continues, a personal God of justice is on His throne, and there is much to be thankful for. 

 

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Full Circle

main image

I want offer a couple of observations this week for you to chew on. I am not suggesting that these are completely filled out, but I believe that there is something here for those with ears to hear. Let’s start theoretically with legalism and antinomianism. It is generally the case that people put legalism (i.e. - a robotic, external conformity to the rules) and antinomianism (i.e - a laissez faire, “no god, no master” approach to life) on opposite ends of a spectrum. But, as has been pointed out by others, especially when it comes to our life before God, legalism and antinomianism actually have the same starting point; ourselves. Both legalism and antinomianism are attempts to live life on our own terms, manipulating God to get what we want. A perfect example of this is the parable of the two sons in Luke 15. Both sons want to “get” from their father. One follows the path of legalism, the other more famously, the path of antinomianism. In the end, rather than being on opposite ends of a spectrum, they come full circle and though they look different on the outside, they are remarkably the same.

My observation is that we see this same principle in other places in life, if we pay attention. Let me share two examples, one positive and one negative. It has been interesting to me to see those on the politically progressive side of the country argue for the rights and protection of the most vulnerable in society when it comes to our response to COVID. The language that is used, the position that is argued for, ends up sounding an awful lot like the position that the politically conservatives have been touting with reference to the abortion debate. Conservatives for years have been saying that we have the responsibility to protect the weakest and most vulnerable in our society. (Incidentally both of these ideas are based on the Christian notion that still exists in our post-Christian society that humans are created in the image of God). In the same way in which the two sons were pursuing the wealth of their father through different means but from the same heart, we see conservatives and progressives arguing for different policies using the same (Biblical) principles. I hope that we are seeing this for the great opportunity it is. We have an amazing Christian story that loves the weakest and most vulnerable! Praise God! May we do all we can to winsomely help people see these good connections, not because they are conservative or progressive, but because they are born from a Biblical root. 

On a slightly less positive note we also see this full circle thinking come out in what I would characterize as selfish ways. Over the years the idea of individual rights and freedoms has been calling card of the politically progressive. The argument has been that my body, my freedoms, are mine and you can’t tell me what to do with them, even if it means harm to those weak and vulnerable around me (i.e.abortion). Unfortunately this line of thinking has come full circle to the politically conservative. Individual rights are supreme (to worship the way we want, to wear masks or not, etc..) no matter what threat it might cause to the weak and the vulnerable around me. Now, before you fill my inbox with ways that these are not equivalent, realize that I am looking at motivations here, not saying they are completely the same. Similar to the parable of the two sons, we find ourselves in situations where protecting what we think belongs to us becomes paramount. 

So what can we learn by observing the full circle ways of life? First, we need to recognize that the heart is deceitful above all things and can easily lead us astray. Because any way of thinking that is not expressly rooted in God’s word ultimately will find itself on one side of an argument, and against the story of the scripture. On judgement day liberals and conservatives, along with rich and poor, educated and uneducated will find themselves in a remarkably similar place because they did not surrender their lives to Christ. Second, we need to come back full circle to the tenets of the Gospel. Specifically that we are all more needy, broken and sinful than we would like to think. But on the flip sided we are more freed, accepted and loved than we ever could have hoped because of the finished work of Christ. On this basis let us with humility continue to examine our hearts to keep short accounts with God and treat our fellow humans with charity.

Ultimately life does come down to a circle and not a linear spectrum. And the question we should be asking is not, what end of the spectrum are you on, but rather is that circle enfolding you, do you belong to the Lord?

 

Photo by Nicola Ricca on Unsplash

12...48495051525354555657 ... 7172

https://analytics.google.com/analytics/web/#/report-home/a107216086w160095995p161340156